Town of Framingham v. Framingham Police Officers Union

Police officer’s assignment is not subject to arbitration or collective bargaining.

Petrini & Associates_Successful Outcomes_Issue.png

Issue

Is the assignment of police officers a proper subject of arbitration?

 
Petrini & Associates_Successful Outcomes_Challenge.png

Challenge

The union sought to arbitrate the reassignment of a police officer which the union claimed was disciplinary in nature and therefore subject to the “just cause” standard provided in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. Framingham sought an injunction at the Superior Court to prevent the arbitration, which the Superior Court denied. The Town then appealed the decision.

 
Petrini & Associates_Successful Outcomes_Outcome.png

Outcome

The Appeals Court held that under both the strong chief’s statute, G.L. c. 41, s. 97A, and the doctrine of nondelegability, that a police officer’s assignment is not subject to arbitration or collective bargaining. Accordingly, the Appeals Court reversed the trial court’s denial of Framingham’s motion for preliminary injunction and directed an injunction to issue preventing the arbitration from going forward.

Previous
Previous

Enterprise Equipment Co. v. Town of Braintree

Next
Next

General Chemical Corp. v. Town of Framingham